Should Every School Have an Armed Presence? Expert Weighs In After Minnesota Shooting
Former police chief says an armed presence could deter attackers and save lives, calling it a critical first line of defense in schools.
A deadly school shooting in Minnesota has once again raised painful questions about how to keep children safe in classrooms. While investigators continue to piece together the timeline of the attack, one law enforcement expert says the discussion should shift to a nationwide plan for placing an armed presence in every school.
John Dale Hartman, a former police chief and security consultant with decades of experience in law enforcement, told me the Minnesota case was unusual because the attack began “from the outside in.” He said that difference highlights just how unpredictable these tragedies can be.
“There’s no one-size-fits-all solution,” Hartman said. “But what we can do is learn from each case and make it far more difficult for someone to succeed if they attempt something like this”.
A Visible Deterrent
Hartman believes having an armed officer stationed at every school could prevent attacks before they begin. “If I know there’s an armed officer at that school, I’m more likely not to mess with that school,” he said. “It changes the calculation for anyone planning an assault”.
He pointed to existing models, such as Pennsylvania, where police officers are often employed as school resource officers. Their presence, he said, does more than provide reassurance. It ensures that someone with tactical training is already inside the building during the critical minutes before 911 calls bring outside help.
“From the moment a call goes out until police arrive, damage is being done,” Hartman said. “Having an armed officer already in place enhances the safety of everyone inside”.
If you are not yet signed up to my free newsletter, please click the button below. You can also become a paid subscriber to support my independent journalism for less than $1 per week.
More Than Just a Gun
Hartman acknowledged that some parents and educators resist the idea of police in schools, fearing it creates an intimidating environment. But he argued that public opinion has shifted in recent years.
“In the 1990s, schools resisted the idea of police on campus,” Hartman said. “Now most parents I talk to feel more comfortable knowing there’s an officer there”.
Still, he stressed that security is not just about one person with a weapon. Effective safety, he said, requires a layered approach that includes building security measures, communication systems, and training for staff and students.
“Security is concentric — it’s about layers,” Hartman said. “No plan is foolproof, but the goal is to make it extremely difficult for anyone to carry out an attack”.
The Role of Mental Health and Community
Hartman also said that preventing future violence goes beyond law enforcement. “This is a communal effort,” he said. “It includes mental health professionals, medical staff, counselors, teachers, administrators, the community, and the students themselves”.
He noted that in many cases, attackers display warning signs beforehand. Too often, he said, those red flags are brushed off. “If you see someone struggling or making threats, don’t just say, ‘He won’t really do that.’ Step up and say something,” Hartman urged.
Funding the Future of School Security
The major obstacle to putting armed officers in every school is cost. Hartman acknowledged that funding decisions fall to lawmakers, but he believes the investment is worth it.
“These are our kids, our future,” Hartman said. “We may not like the fact that we need this, but the reality is schools are soft targets. We have to protect them the best we can”.
For Hartman, the bottom line is clear: while no single measure will eliminate school shootings, placing armed professionals in schools is a critical step toward prevention.
“You’re never going to eliminate every weapon or every threat,” he said. “But an armed presence gives schools a fighting chance”.
For more information on his work, Hartman can be reached at JohnDaleHartmanInvestigations.com.
Absolutely! We had a resource officer until no one wanted to pick up half of her pay when the grant ran out. Discipline dropped drastically and so did bullying. Then we got retired Sgt. Hold up the Wall. He spent so much time with the school secretary she complained to the principal. He was told his job was in the hallways. So, he took up a post one one of the corners in the hallway and leaned up against it with his cup of coffee. He didn't interact with the kids and discipline rose again and bullying resurfaced. He was worthless. We could put retired Army, Navy, Air Force personnel in schools armed. Those dudes would shoot first and ask questions later, but they'd lay down their lives for the kids. No child is safe in a school anymore. We had a parent show up at school because he heard there was someone with a gun at the school. He left his gun in his truck and went in to get permission to see if his son was okay. He came down to the room and I quietly let the other teacher in the room know I had the parent. I walked to the door pulling it closed behind me. He told me he'd heard there was someone with a weapon in the building. I told him the story has been stretched to be untrue. What happened was one of the middle school teachers had had an antique gun repaired and the man working on it came up at lunch time to deliver it to the teacher. The teacher came to the parking lot, checked out the gun and put it in his car and paid the man who fixed it. The teacher finished the school year. Packed up his wife and moved to Ky or TN. Got a teaching job and was so worried the gun incident would get him fired that one Friday night in October he took himself to his favorite hiking spot into the woods with his gun. He sat in the car and pulled the trigger. He'd turned the ac to very cold first. Left a note for his wife and his life was over. It as.
Absolutely. School Resource Officers are invaluable to schools. They provide an armed, on site deterrent. Just as important, they cultivate and develop relationships with students and staff. The number of issues that do not occur, as well as those that are mitigated, cannot be measured. My personal experience with SRO’s in Clio Schools and Holly Schools leaves no doubt to the answer: YES. Every school should have an armed presence, preferably a SRO.