Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rebecka Vigus's avatar

This makes sense if the outside agency released the information publicly. I thought from reading the statement that it was turned over when medical records were requested. Did I misread it? Because I don't believe the individual was actually trying to violate any laws. S/he just had their body cam on. I agree the cams should remain on. It protects the officers and other personnel from a detanee goes ballistic.

George  Pellett's avatar

The cameras should remain in service. Just covering up their butts.

No posts

Ready for more?